DWG NO. 02.3 — Lesson 3 of 5

Deductive Reasoning and the Laws of Logic

Unit 2: Reasoning and Proof · ~15–30 min

Objective

Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism to draw logically valid conclusions from true conditional statements.

Deductive vs. inductive reasoning

Deductive reasoning uses accepted facts, definitions, and postulates to reach a conclusion that must be true. That's different from the inductive reasoning of Lesson 2.1, which only spots a pattern that's likely true. Deductive reasoning is how conjectures get turned into proven theorems — and it runs on two core laws.

The Law of Detachment

If a conditional p → q is true, and its hypothesis p is also true, then the conclusion q must be true. In other words: once you know the “if” part happened, the “then” part is guaranteed.

The Law of Syllogism

If p → q is true and q → r is true, then p → r is true. Two conditionals chain together into a new one, as long as the conclusion of the first matches the hypothesis of the second.

p q r if p then q if q then r so if p then r — Law of Syllogism

Two true conditionals chain into a third: p→q and q→r combine into p→r.

Worked Example 1 · Law of Detachment
ProblemGiven: “If a figure is a square, then it is a rectangle” (true), and “Figure ABCD is a square” (true).
1.The hypothesis of the conditional (“a figure is a square”) matches the given fact about ABCD.
2.By the Law of Detachment, the conclusion must follow: ABCD is a rectangle.
Conclusion: ABCD is a rectangle
Worked Example 2 · Law of Syllogism
ProblemGiven: “If an angle is acute, then it measures less than 90°” and “If an angle measures less than 90°, then it is not a right angle.”
1.The conclusion of the first statement (“measures less than 90°”) matches the hypothesis of the second.
2.By the Law of Syllogism, chain them into one new conditional.
If an angle is acute, then it is not a right angle.

Guided practice